Strong
Core controls are healthy. Continue monitoring and review any remaining warnings.

Use this guide to understand the score, decide what needs attention, read discovered records, and turn technical findings into a practical remediation plan.
The score summarizes the controls tested. Failed checks have a greater effect than warnings, while informational items do not necessarily reduce the score.
Core controls are healthy. Continue monitoring and review any remaining warnings.
The foundation is useful, but one or more controls should be strengthened.
Important gaps exist. Create a remediation plan and address higher-severity findings.
Major controls may be missing or failing. Prioritize immediate investigation.
Do not judge the domain by the score alone. A single failed control may matter more to your organization than several passed checks.
The control was found and met the condition tested at scan time.
Usually no immediate action. Keep monitoring for changes.
The control exists but is incomplete, weak, nearing expiry, or could not be fully confirmed.
Review the evidence and recommended action. Plan a correction.
A required control is missing, invalid, unavailable, or presents a material risk.
Prioritize the finding, assign an owner, and verify the fix.
The result provides context or describes a test that was intentionally not performed.
Read the note. It may still identify an optional improvement.
Identifies the security control, such as DMARC policy or SSL certificate.
Explains what the scanner observed at the time of the test.
Shows the actual public DNS value or evidence returned by the scan. Compare it with the intended configuration.
Describes the desired correction. Validate provider-specific values before publishing them.
After making the change, allow for DNS TTL and propagation, then run a new scan to confirm the result.
DMARC policy is set to p=none.
v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:reports@example.comRecommended actionReview legitimate senders and alignment reports, then progress gradually to p=quarantine and p=reject.
SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and BIMI help receiving systems distinguish legitimate mail from spoofed messages.
MX, SMTP, reverse DNS, mail TLS, MTA-STS, and TLS-RPT cover routing, reachability, identity, and encryption.
Website availability, HTTPS redirects, certificates, and browser security headers protect visitors and service continuity.
DNS propagation, authoritative nameservers, and registration expiry affect every website and email service on the domain.
Blocklist checks identify public reputation signals that may affect trust and email delivery.
Results are based primarily on public DNS, network responses, certificate information, HTTP behavior, registration data, and supported reputation sources.
A passed result does not prove that every user, device, cloud service, mail flow, or internal system is secure. Some controls require provider access or human review.
“Not found” can mean the record is missing, published under a different selector or hostname, not visible to the resolver yet, or temporarily unavailable.
Open-relay testing is intentionally not performed automatically because intrusive probing can be disruptive and misleading.
Use the report appendix for technical evidence, then assign owners and verify each correction with a new scan.